# Download Convex Functions and their Applications: A Contemporary by Constantin Niculescu PDF By Constantin Niculescu

Thorough advent to an immense region of arithmetic includes contemporary effects contains many workouts

Similar functional analysis books

Real Functions—Current Topics

So much books dedicated to the speculation of the quintessential have neglected the nonabsolute integrals, even though the magazine literature on the subject of those has develop into richer and richer. the purpose of this monograph is to fill this hole, to accomplish a learn at the huge variety of sessions of actual capabilities which were brought during this context, and to demonstrate them with many examples.

The Hardy Space H1 with Non-doubling Measures and Their Applications

The current publication deals an important yet available creation to the discoveries first made within the Nineties that the doubling is superfluous for many effects for functionality areas and the boundedness of operators. It indicates the tools in the back of those discoveries, their results and a few in their functions.

Additional resources for Convex Functions and their Applications: A Contemporary Approach

Sample text

Prove that a continuous convex function f : [a, b] → R can be extended to a convex function on R if and only if f+ (a) and f− (b) are ﬁnite. 6. 10 to prove that the sine function is strictly concave on [0, π]. Infer that x a cot a sin a x ≤ sin x ≤ sin a a a for every a ∈ (0, π/2] and every x ∈ [0, a]. For a = π/2 this yields the classical inequality of Jordan. 7. Let f : [0, 2π] → R be a convex function. Prove that an = 2π 1 π f (t) cos nt dt ≥ 0 for every n ≥ 1. 0 8. (J. L. W. V. Jensen ) Prove that a function f : [0, M ] → R is nondecreasing if and only if n n λk f (xk ) ≤ k=1 n λk f k=1 xk k=1 for all ﬁnite families λ1 , .

5 The Subdiﬀerential 29 Exercises 1. (Kantorovich’s inequality) Let m, M, a1 , . . , an be positive numbers, with m < M . Prove that the maximum of n f (x1 , . . , xn ) = n ak xk ak /xk k=1 k=1 for x1 , . . ,n} 2 ak − min k∈X ak . k∈ X Remark. The following particular case 1 n n xk k=1 1 n n k=1 1 xk (M + m)2 (1 + (−1)n+1 )(M − m)2 − 4M m 8M mn2 ≤ represents an improvement on Schweitzer’s inequality for odd n. 2. Let ak , bk , ck , mk , Mk , mk , Mk be positive numbers with mk < Mk and mk < Mk for k ∈ {1, .

K=1 In particular, x21 + · · · + x2n x1 + · · · + xn 2 M 2 + ≤ , n n 4 which represents an additive converse to the Cauchy–Buniakovski–Schwarz inequality. 1, the function n n λk xpk − E(x1 , . . , xn ) = k=1 p λk xk , k=1 attains its supremum on [0, M ]n at a point whose coordinates are either 0 or M . Therefore sup E(x1 , . . , xn ) does not exceed M p ·sup {s − sp | s ∈ [0, 1]} = (p − 1) pp/(1−p) M p . 5 The Subdiﬀerential 29 Exercises 1. (Kantorovich’s inequality) Let m, M, a1 , . . , an be positive numbers, with m < M .